January 25, 2009

Phil Watch: I Don't Know Where To Begin


Anyone ever have a wildly irresponsible friend?

You know, the kind of guy who gets drunk and tries to jump off the roof of the apartment just to see if he can do it without breaking his leg.

And this friend on occasion - say every three years or so - asks to borrow your car to see if he can drive to Midway and back in an hour to, you know, just see if can do it.

And every three years or so you have say, "Hell no!"

He counters with "What's going to happen? You can't predict accidents. You could get into an accident tomorrow!"

And you have to sit him down like he's a five year-old and tell him, "That's the difference, little one. It's my car...and I'm driving. If something happens, it's going to be on me, not because I gave the keys to some dope who's bored and wants to prove how big his dick is."

That's what Phil seems to be missing when ripping into John Danks for passing on the World Baseball Classic today.

Seriously, this is why people don't read newspapers anymore.

Let's get started.

White Sox fans are very proud of John Danks. He declined the chance to play for the U.S. in the World Baseball Classic, saying he wants to make sure he's prepared for the 2009 season.

This is a very popular position for him to take, but it raises a couple of questions:

• Why can't a 23-year-old in great shape make two or three starts in March, working with strict pitch limits and extreme caution, without risking his readiness for the season?

• Why would the U.S. want Danks in the first place?

Let's see. Danks just completed a season where he pitched 40 more innings than he has ever thrown and is coming into a season where the Sox are going to rely on him heavily with the back of the rotation so up in the air.

I know! He should skip the bulk of Spring Training with the Sox and go play in some dippy Bug Selig creation with absolutely no point just because he can. Let's hand the keys to your brand-new car to someone else. Why not?

Phil's first question begs another question. If every player in the "Classic" is going to have to be treated with kid gloves, then why do it? It's not even a real game. It's cutesy bullshit.

Phil's second question begs a "Huh?"

He's a good pitcher and a tough competitor with a great future. Every major-league team would want to have him on its roster. But he has had one strong season in the big leagues. Does that qualify him to represent his country?

Love it! "Represent his country," like it's some Olympian honor where people train their whole lives just for the miniscule chance to compete in something that will most likely define the rest of their lives.

That's what this is NOT!

Who'd a thunk it? Phil has taken a position on the World Baseball Classic that's even more idiotic than anything Rick Telander could offer. It's like Telander on crack, chockablock with dreamy, pie-eyed international wonderfulness.

What about CC Sabathia? Or Brandon Webb? Or at least a half-dozen others, such as Cole Hamels, Tim Lincecum, Roy Halladay, Derek Lowe, John Lackey and Cliff Lee?

Or Mickey Morandini? Or Lenny Dykstra?

You take any four of those eight guys, you have a serious staff, a real All-Star team, the kind of team that was envisioned when Commissioner Bud Selig and his staffers dreamed up the WBC.

Yes. The kind of ideas that come from dreams. Then you wake up, give it ten minutes and realize that idea was borderline retarded.

But unfortunately, major-league dugouts and front offices are populated by far too many short-sighted, self-interested players and executives.

Yeah. God forbid try to protect your investment. That's just stupid business sense.

Notice that Phil hasn't told us WHY the WBC is remotely a good idea yet?

The second edition of the WBC gets here in March, three years after the inaugural, in which the U.S. went 3-3 and failed to advance to the four-team final round.

That was such a blow to my patriotism. I felt like less of an American that day.

Once again the U.S. has put together a team lacking the bulk of American talent, limiting the possible success of the event before it even begins.

Can this country take another blow to its already diminished status around the world?

Sabathia, Webb and those other six starting pitchers are among the huge group of American stars who didn't submit their names for inclusion on the provisional roster or whose names were pulled back before the roster was released.

Sabathia pitched 40,000 innings last year and just signed a 40 year deal worth 40 bazillion dollars. The Yankees should allow him to run out there on the mother of all short rests for no real reason.

That plan is flawless! This isn't play money, Phil. It's real, like money that can buy stuff.

...The guys who are eager to play, like the Cubs' Derrek Lee and the White Sox's Matt Thornton, deserve credit for getting it.

Derrek Lee and Matt Thornton are better Americans than C.C. Sabathia and Brandon Webb.

Traitors. Somebody call Michelle Bachmann.

The WBC should be a welcome break from the drudgery of spring training. It's surprising that more players don't look at it like this.

My God, Phil. Just have sex for Selig and get it over with.

Phil here alludes to complaints on the part of some players recently that Spring Training is too long, which it probably is.

Congratulations. He just gave reason #10,659 why NOT to extend the preseason with kitschy little 'World Competitions'. To be game-ready (or what is supposed to approximate 'game-ready' for for this crap), position players have to start training two weeks earlier than usual and pitchers would need three. You know...to be stupid-ass "Classic"-ready.

It is supposed to be real games, right? Not time for pitchers to work on specific pitches and hone their location like Spring Training games are, right?

Freakin' great plan.

...Bottom line: Baseball players shouldn't be afraid to play baseball.

Thems fightin' words.

Derrek Lee = Rambo. Webb = Aldrich Ames.

I nominate this column as a top fiver in the Phil anthology, behind recommending the Rays sign Barry Bonds because it would be fun to see him hit in Fenway but ahead of the entire column dedicated to the wonders of Jeremy Affeldt.


Phil was a voluminous little fucker again this Sunday with no mid-week columns.

His second long-form offering discusses the sale of the Cubs to the Ricketts family. It gives nothing in the way of substance outside of recapping the obvious with a few dippy Cub fan '100 year' jokes thrown in.

But here's two nuggets:

If Ricketts wanted, he could find a big role in his organization (president or whatever title you want) for a baseball savant like recently retired general manager Pat Gillick. Or, if he wanted to try something really progressive, Greg Maddux, who figures to get bored playing golf. Those guys would represent the club and help Jim Hendry and his strong front-office staff in setting a vision for the operation.

That way, when Phil achieves immaculate conception and has Greg Maddux's baby, he'll be closer for family time.

President. Greg Maddux. Jus cuz he's all Cubbie and shit.

...(discussing the renovation of Wrigley Field) For this to happen, the Cubs may have to shift a season's worth of games to U.S. Cellular Field and possibly even Milwaukee's Miller Park—and the sooner the better. Why not get the work done in time for the 2014 season, allowing fans to celebrate Wrigley's 100th anniversary in a much-improved park?

The Cubs should rearrange theirs and two other teams' entire schedules because 100 is a round number. It's pretty. Oh, so pretty.

Cub fan to the core. Phil. You are my muse.

January 18, 2009

Phil Watch: Mishmash Of Mucky Muck


Ever watch a movie and think it was fine enough as the credits rolled? And then you get into the car and realize, "Holy Crap, that movie sucked!"

It comes from being able to step back a bit and see it's suckitude in all it's glory.

We'll call it the Burn After Reading effect.

Phil's column today has it. Boy, does it have it. It's Phil's Whispers. He has his ear to the ground for us, people.

Let's get started.

How committed are the Cubs to Ryan Theriot as their shortstop? There was never even internal discussion about pursuing Michael Young, who the Rangers made available after he balked at moving to third base.

Yes. Ryan Theriot's diminutive wonderfulness is what stopped Hendry from talking about Michael Young. Not the fact that the Cubs are about to be sold and Young has a contract that pays him $16 million each year for the next five years. Yes. Not that. It's Ryan Theriot and all his throwback greatness to the 30s and 40s.

Young and the Rangers appear to have worked out their differences, meaning it's Hank Blalock the Rangers are trying to trade. …Blalock's availability doesn't help the market for Joe Crede, who is among the large group of free agents still unsigned. …

Yes. A team should trade a couple of decent to good minor leaguers for Blalock and pick up his $6.25 million contract for 2009 instead of signing Joe Crede to an incentive-laden one year deal worth $5 million with an option. Yes. That's the way teams should operate. Give up something or somethings for Blalock, a guy who also hasn't played a full season since 2006. Phil = Consistent.

Also unsigned is a large group that was offered arbitration and declined it, including Orlando Cabrera, Ben Sheets, Juan Cruz, Jon Garland, Brandon Lyon and Oliver Perez. Brewers GM Doug Melvin said he considered signing Cruz as his closer but opted for Trevor Hoffman because he didn't want to give up a first-round draft pick. …

Phil. Sweety. Melvin was being nice. If he let it all fly, Melvin would have said that Cruz has been a decent middle reliever over the last two years, has a WHIP that says it's been a bit of a mirage and HAS NEVER CLOSED! Yes. Give up a first round draft pick for that.

Spring training sleeper for the Cubs—center fielder Sam Fuld, who has had a big winter in Venezuela and has leadoff man skills. For the White Sox—third baseman Javier Castillo, a non-roster invitee who hit .288 between Double-A Birmingham and Triple-A Charlotte last season. …

Cripes! That's the 48 bazillionth time he's mentioned Sam freakin' Fuld's "big" winter in the freakin' Venezuelan league. Please tell me how Fuld gets into the lineup to lead off. Please. No answer has been given yet. Cubs outfield: Soriano, Bradley, Fukudome, Johnson, Gathright. And man, if Fuld breaks camp with the Cubs, they're quickly becoming a nugget convention with Theriot, Fontenot and him.

Javier Castillo? A light-hitting third basemen with a career .266 minor league average, doesn't walk and is a little too booty? Fuck Viciedo and Fields. He's is The Answer!

The Brewers are interested in free-agent starter Braden Looper.

Early 2009 nomination for the most irrelevant sentence ever written ever.


And then there's Phil's flagship Sunday column.

...Both Reinsdorf and McCourt keep a close eye on the bottom line. While Reinsdorf took the White Sox's payroll into the nine-digit stratosphere in the honeymoon seasons after the 2005 championship, he and general manager Ken Williams now appear ahead of the curve in watching out for the economic downturn facing baseball and other professional sports.

Nine-digit stratosphere? It was $103 million, good for 4th in baseball...after a World freakin' Championship. Now...I'm thinking that Phil believes that kind of spending is bad given the word choice and the fact that he wrote 4,000 columns in 2008 about the White Sox irresponsible spending. Let's see who this plays out.

And they're not 'ahead of the curve'. Has Phil been watching this offseason? Not one team will enter 2009 with a payroll higher than 2008. Not one. Not even the Yankees.

The White Sox opened 2008 with a payroll of $121.2 million and added to it by trading for Ken Griffey Jr. at the trading deadline. The signing of Bartolo Colon gave them 14 players signed at $83.525 million. Factoring in the arbitration-eligible Bobby Jenks and 10 entry-level players, they will be in the range of $92-94 million when the season opens—and they are still open to trading Jermaine Dye, which could lower that figure.

So that's pretty good...right?

The movement to get younger—creating opportunity for players like Josh Fields, Dayan Viciedo, Chris Getz, Brian Anderson, Jerry Owens and Brent Lillibridge—is allowing the White Sox to cut almost $30 million off the payroll, seemingly without being passed by anyone in the American League Central.

So...really good...right?

The Dodgers' cost-cutting is even worse, as Manny Ramirez can testify. The reality with a situation almost as strange as Ramirez himself is that it now appears the Dodgers never really wanted to re-sign Ramirez. Many around baseball believe general manager Ned Colletti made Ramirez a two-year offer only to save face, with the expectation that somebody would outbid him. But that hasn't happened.

Worse? Probably poor word choice. But...worse?

And so...now we have the Dodgers NOT signing Manny. They're NOT signing him in Phil's world for the reasons given.

If the Dodgers really wanted to keep Ramirez, they would have done it by now. But whispers have gone around for years about McCourt not having the usual financial muscle of Dodgers' owners, and that is being borne out this winter.

So again...there's NOT signing Manny...in Phil's world...for the 12,000 reasons given.

...The Dodgers opened the 2008 season with a payroll of $118.6 million, and added Ramirez, Casey Blake and Greg Maddux in midseason deals. But they since have released Andruw Jones, lost six free agents to other teams (most notably Derek Lowe and Brad Penny) and allowed eight others, including Ramirez, to linger unsigned.

So...they're...cutting...payrolllllll. And no Manny...?

They have only about $52 million committed to nine players, with two of the three biggest contracts belonging to players who haven't helped ( Juan Pierre and Jason Schmidt). They have four arbitration-eligible players, including catcher Russell Martin and closer Jonathan Broxton, and are expected eventually to re-sign Ramirez.

JEBUS H. CHRIST!!!! YOU JUST SAID THEY'RE NOT GOING TO SIGN MANNY!!!!!!!!

While the Sox count on production from inexpensive contributors like Carlos Quentin, Alexei Ramirez, John Danks and Gavin Floyd, the Dodgers have a deeper, more touted core of young players. Matt Kemp, Andre Ethier, James Loney and Martin figure to hit together near the middle of the order for years to come.

De-Bat-Able. Matt Kemp looks like a monkey humping a football when he plays the outfield. Loney hasn't developed anything resembling consistent power yet (except against the Cubs in the playoffs, of course. Tee-hee.) and Ethier? Meh. We'll see. They were a .500 team last year in a shit-ass division before trading for Manny.

Chad Billingsley, Clayton Kershaw, James McDonald and Cory Wade similarly anchor the pitching staff (although Billingsley may not be ready to open 2009 because of a November broken leg, when he slipped on ice).

Anchor?

Billingsley = Good. Yes.

Kershaw = Should be decent. Great hook. Had some control issues.

McDonald = Six major league innings. Six.

Wade = Never started a major league game. Never.

And where the hell is Kuroda?

Gee whiz, Phil. Two guys have no major league starting experience, one is coming off an injury and the other is primed to go through growing pains. How is that 'anchoring' anything?

But can you cut your payroll 30 percent and defend a division title? The Dodgers, like the White Sox, hope the answer is yes.

Well...it kind of depending on what that 30 percent is, doesn't it? Just a thought.